Psychiatric co-morbidities and substance abuse are dominant factors in Predicting Emergency Department usage rates
Main Article Content
Abstract
Importance: 1% of the United States population accounts for 20% of healthcare costs. What characterizes heavy users of the Emergency Department (UED) both demographically and clinically is an area of active research.
Objective: Compare the proportion of nine common co-morbidities between heavy, moderate, and infrequent users then compare episodic and continuous heavy UED.
Setting:. A large metropolitan healthcare system.
Participants: Heavy users were selected using a retrospective chart review of Barnes-Jewish Emergency Department records from 2010-2011. Emergency department usage for all unique patients seen in the time period specified was determined for two non-overlapping 365-day periods. Patients were stratified into 1 of 3 groups: Heavy users (> 10 visits for both periods), moderate users (5-9 visits for both periods), and infrequent users (1 visit in either the first or last period). There were 546 moderate users and 59,957 infrequent users matched 1:1 against 160 heavy users. These patients were matched for age, race, gender, and insurance. The 160 continuous heavy users were also compared to 388 patients who had > 10 visits in the first period, but not the second period, and 443 patients who had > 10 visits in the second period, but not the first. The proportion of subjects within each group was compared based on nine co-morbidities (substance abuse, mental illness, chronic pain, heart disease, lung disease, kidney disease, liver disease, cancer and stroke) using 95% confidence intervals.
Results: Infrequent users had lower rates of all co-morbidities. Moderate users had similar rates of all co-morbidities to heavy users, except slightly higher CVA rates (13.7% v 10.6%; p = 0.49), lower rates for mental illness (33.3% v 43.1%; p = 0.08) and significantly lower rates for substance abuse (17% v 35%; p < 0.001). Only substance abuse demonstrated a significant difference between episodic and continuous heavy UED (35% v 23.5%; p = 0.002).
Conclusion: Among nine common co-morbidities, only substance abuse rates were significantly higher among heavy users compared to matched moderate UED in our healthcare system. Infrequent users had lower rates of all co-morbidities. When comparing continuous and episodic heavy emergency department users, only substance abuse rates were significantly higher.
Downloads
Article Details
Copyright (c) 2022 Mitchell L, et al.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Licensing and protecting the author rights is the central aim and core of the publishing business. Peertechz dedicates itself in making it easier for people to share and build upon the work of others while maintaining consistency with the rules of copyright. Peertechz licensing terms are formulated to facilitate reuse of the manuscripts published in journals to take maximum advantage of Open Access publication and for the purpose of disseminating knowledge.
We support 'libre' open access, which defines Open Access in true terms as free of charge online access along with usage rights. The usage rights are granted through the use of specific Creative Commons license.
Peertechz accomplice with- [CC BY 4.0]
Explanation
'CC' stands for Creative Commons license. 'BY' symbolizes that users have provided attribution to the creator that the published manuscripts can be used or shared. This license allows for redistribution, commercial and non-commercial, as long as it is passed along unchanged and in whole, with credit to the author.
Please take in notification that Creative Commons user licenses are non-revocable. We recommend authors to check if their funding body requires a specific license.
With this license, the authors are allowed that after publishing with Peertechz, they can share their research by posting a free draft copy of their article to any repository or website.
'CC BY' license observance:
License Name |
Permission to read and download |
Permission to display in a repository |
Permission to translate |
Commercial uses of manuscript |
CC BY 4.0 |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
The authors please note that Creative Commons license is focused on making creative works available for discovery and reuse. Creative Commons licenses provide an alternative to standard copyrights, allowing authors to specify ways that their works can be used without having to grant permission for each individual request. Others who want to reserve all of their rights under copyright law should not use CC licenses.
Cohen SB, Uberoi N. Differentials in the Concentration in the Level of Health Expenditures across Population Subgroups in the U.S., 2010. 2013 Aug. In: Statistical Brief (Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (US)) [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2001–. STATISTICAL BRIEF #421. PMID: 29708701.
Stanton MW, Rutherford MK. The high concentration of U.S. health care expenditures. Agency for Healthcare research and Quality. 2005; 06-0060.
Rais S, Nazerian A, Ardal S, Chechulin Y, Bains N, Malikov K. High-cost users of Ontario's healthcare services. Healthc Policy. 2013 Aug;9(1):44-51. PMID: 23968673; PMCID: PMC3999548.
Ash AS, Zhao Y, Ellis RP, Schlein Kramer M. Finding future high-cost cases: comparing prior cost versus diagnosis-based methods. Health Serv Res. 2001 Dec;36(6 Pt 2):194-206. PMID: 16148969; PMCID: PMC1383615.
Fleishman JA, Cohen JW. Using information on clinical conditions to predict high-cost patients. Health Serv Res. 2010 Apr;45(2):532-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.01080.x. Epub 2010 Jan 27. PMID: 20132341; PMCID: PMC2838159.
Moturu ST, Johnson WG, Liu H. Predictive Risk Modeling for Forecasting High-Cost Patients: A Real-World Application Using Medicaid Data. International Journal of Biomedical Engineering and Technology. 2010; 3(1/2):114–32.
LaCalle E, Rabin E. Frequent users of emergency departments: the myths, the data, and the policy implications. Ann Emerg Med. 2010 Jul;56(1):42-8. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.01.032. Epub 2010 Mar 26. PMID: 20346540.
Raven M, Gould D. Time and again: frequent users of emergency department services in New York City. United Hospital Fund. 2012.
U.S. Census Bureau. State & County Quick Facts. "St. Louis (city), Missouri".
Saint Louis Regional Health Commission. Progress Towards Building a Healthier St. Louis: 2013 Access to Care Data Book. 2013 Dec.
Gilbert EH, Lowenstein SR, Koziol-McLain J, Barta DC, Steiner J. Chart reviews in emergency medicine research: Where are the methods? Ann Emerg Med. 1996 Mar;27(3):305-8. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(96)70264-0. PMID: 8599488.
Ruger JP, Richter CJ, Spitznagel EL, Lewis LM. Analysis of costs, length of stay, and utilization of emergency department services by frequent users: implications for health policy. Acad Emerg Med. 2004 Dec;11(12):1311-7. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2004.07.008. PMID: 15576522.
Fuda KK, Immekus R. Frequent users of Massachusetts emergency departments: a statewide analysis. Ann Emerg Med. 2006 Jul;48(1):9-16. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.03.001. PMID: 16781915.
Doupe MB, Palatnick W, Day S, Chateau D, Soodeen RA, Burchill C, Derksen S. Frequent users of emergency departments: developing standard definitions and defining prominent risk factors. Ann Emerg Med. 2012 Jul;60(1):24-32. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.11.036. Epub 2012 Feb 2. PMID: 22305330.
Hunt KA, Weber EJ, Showstack JA, Colby DC, Callaham ML. Characteristics of frequent users of emergency departments. Ann Emerg Med. 2006 Jul;48(1):1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2005.12.030. Epub 2006 Mar 30. PMID: 16781914.
Sandoval E, Smith S, Walter J, Schuman SA, Olson MP, Striefler R, Brown S, Hickner J. A comparison of frequent and infrequent visitors to an urban emergency department. J Emerg Med. 2010 Feb;38(2):115-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2007.09.042. Epub 2008 May 7. PMID: 18462906.
Mandelberg JH, Kuhn RE, Kohn MA. Epidemiologic analysis of an urban, public emergency department's frequent users. Acad Emerg Med. 2000 Jun;7(6):637-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2000.tb02037.x. PMID: 10905642.
Brennan JJ, Chan TC, Hsia RY, Wilson MP, Castillo EM. Emergency department utilization among frequent users with psychiatric visits. Acad Emerg Med. 2014 Sep;21(9):1015-22. doi: 10.1111/acem.12453. PMID: 25269582.
Miller JB, Brauer E, Rao H, Wickenheiser K, Dev S, Omino R, Stokes-Buzzelli S. The most frequent ED patients carry insurance and a significant burden of disease. Am J Emerg Med. 2013 Jan;31(1):16-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2012.05.001. Epub 2012 Jul 15. PMID: 22795986.
National Center for Health Statistics (US). Health, United States, 2013: With Special Feature on Prescription Drugs. Hyattsville (MD): National Center for Health Statistics (US); 2014 May. Report No.: 2014-1232. PMID: 24967476.
Brauer E, Miller J, Stokes-Buzzelli S. Social factors affecting super-users at an urban emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2010; 17:S176–177.