Crossing intersectoral boundaries to reach out to vulnerable populations with chronic conditions in five European regions
Main Article Content
Abstract
Introduction: Vulnerable people with chronic conditions should be a priority of policy and interventions. Very often, however, they are hard-to-reach and reluctant “to come to see us”.
This paper describes the intersectoral alliances used in the EU funded project EFFICHRONIC to identify and enrol hard-to-reach vulnerable populations with chronic conditions to participate in a self-care programme.
Methods: The recruitment approach combined population-based and individual strategies. Vulnerability maps based on specific deprivation indices were developed to prioritize the intervention in those areas with higher vulnerability. Within those areas, potential participants were individually recruited following a variety of recruitment strategies.
Results: To reach the vulnerable population, alliances with local and regional authorities, health services, social care organizations and civil society were generated across the EFFICHRONIC sites.
As a result of this collaborative effort, a total number of 2.951 vulnerable participants distributed over the 5 European countries have been engaged.
Discussion: Forging cross-sectoral alliances has been both enriching and challenging. Our key learnings from this experience include: create a persuasive vision; identify the right agents in the territory, the key people in the organisations and the influential leaders within the community; keep continuous liaison and communications, and ensure effective leadership.
Conclusion: Our learnings can contribute to future improvements for policy and practice.
Downloads
Article Details
Copyright (c) 2021 Rosete AA, et al.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Licensing and protecting the author rights is the central aim and core of the publishing business. Peertechz dedicates itself in making it easier for people to share and build upon the work of others while maintaining consistency with the rules of copyright. Peertechz licensing terms are formulated to facilitate reuse of the manuscripts published in journals to take maximum advantage of Open Access publication and for the purpose of disseminating knowledge.
We support 'libre' open access, which defines Open Access in true terms as free of charge online access along with usage rights. The usage rights are granted through the use of specific Creative Commons license.
Peertechz accomplice with- [CC BY 4.0]
Explanation
'CC' stands for Creative Commons license. 'BY' symbolizes that users have provided attribution to the creator that the published manuscripts can be used or shared. This license allows for redistribution, commercial and non-commercial, as long as it is passed along unchanged and in whole, with credit to the author.
Please take in notification that Creative Commons user licenses are non-revocable. We recommend authors to check if their funding body requires a specific license.
With this license, the authors are allowed that after publishing with Peertechz, they can share their research by posting a free draft copy of their article to any repository or website.
'CC BY' license observance:
License Name |
Permission to read and download |
Permission to display in a repository |
Permission to translate |
Commercial uses of manuscript |
CC BY 4.0 |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
The authors please note that Creative Commons license is focused on making creative works available for discovery and reuse. Creative Commons licenses provide an alternative to standard copyrights, allowing authors to specify ways that their works can be used without having to grant permission for each individual request. Others who want to reserve all of their rights under copyright law should not use CC licenses.
Dalstra JA, Kunst AE, Borrell C, Breeze E, Cambois E, et al. (2005) Socioeconomic differences in the prevalence of common chronic diseases: an overview of eight European countries. Int J Epidemiol 34: 316-326. Link: https://bit.ly/3ymw9px
Kodner DL, Spreeuwenberg C (2002) Integrated care: meaning, logic, applications, and implications–a discussion paper. Int J Integr Care Int J Integr Care 2: e12. Link: https://bit.ly/2WthGej
Marmot M, Wilkinson R (Eds.) (2005) Social determinants of health. Oup Oxford 365. Link: https://bit.ly/2WrpYE2
Hart JT (1971) The inverse care law. Lancet 297: 405-412. Link: https://bit.ly/3zpLSWp
Hébert R (2017) Canada: application of a coordinated-type integration model for vulnerable older people in Quebec: the PRISMA project. In Handbook Integrated Care. Springer, Cham 499-510. Link: https://bit.ly/3mG25TS
Goyer CF (2011) Key Elements of Integrated Care for Persons Experiencing Homelessness. Link: https://bit.ly/3BjTGcS
Bonevski B, Randell M, Paul C, Chapman K, Twyman L, et al. (2014) Reaching the hard-to-reach: a systematic review of strategies for improving health and medical research with socially disadvantaged groups. BMC Med Res Methodol 14: 1-29. Link: https://bit.ly/3jqu4VD
Thompson S, Phillips D (2007) Reaching and engaging hard-to-reach populations with a high proportion of nonassociative members. Qual Health Res 17: 1292-1303. Link: https://bit.ly/3zoCySD
Flanagan SM, Hancock B (2010) Reaching the hard to reach'-lessons learned from the VCS (voluntary and community Sector). A qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res 10: 92. Link: https://bit.ly/3ztovev
Costongs C (2017) Euro Health Net. Impact 96-97. Link: https://bit.ly/3DqzWG3
Liljas AE, Walters K, Jovicic A, Iliffe S, Manthorpe J, et al. (2019) Engaging ‘hard to reach’groups in health promotion: the views of older people and professionals from a qualitative study in England. BMC Public Health 19: 629. Link: https://bit.ly/3ysbPDg
European Union’s Health Programme, EFFICHRONIC Project. Ficyt, Asturias. Link: http://effichronic.eu/
Boone AL, Pisano-Gonzalez MM, Valsecchi V, Tan SS, Pers YM, et al. (2019) EFFICHRONIC study protocol: a non-controlled, multicentre European prospective study to measure the efficiency of a chronic disease self-management programme in socioeconomically vulnerable populations. BMJ Open 9: e032073. Link: https://bit.ly/3krijgO
World Health Organization (2011) Rio political declaration on social determinants of health. In World conference on social determinants of health. Rio de Janeiro: World Health Organization 21. Link: https://bit.ly/3sVh5yf
Goodwin N, Stein V, Amelung V (2021) What is integrated care?. In Handbook integrated care. Springer, Cham 3-25.. Link: https://bit.ly/2WoCmEN
International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC), What is vulnerability?. Link: https://bit.ly/3gYBQ7B
Española CR (2007) Informe anual sobre la vulnerabilidad social 2006. Madrid: Cruz Roja Espanola.
Hoppitt T, Shah S, Bradburn P, Gill P, Calvert M, et al. (2012) Reaching the ‘hard to reach’: strategies to recruit black and minority ethnic service users with rare long-term neurological conditions. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 15: 485-495. Link: https://bit.ly/3t1Fi68
Collins B (2018) The Montefiore Health System in New York. London: The Kings Fund. Link: https://bit.ly/3mN3B6q
Horowitz CR, Brenner BL, Lachapelle S, Amara DA, Arniella G (2009) Effective recruitment of minority populations through community-led strategies. Am J Prev Med 37: S195-S200. Link: https://bit.ly/3gBnZ6M
Lorig KR, Sobel DS, Ritter PL, Laurent D, Hobbs M (2001) Effect of a self-management program on patients with chronic disease. Eff Clin Pract ECP 4: 256-262. Link: https://bit.ly/3jnWNuf
Lorig KR, Sobel DS, Stewart AL, Brown BW, Bandura A, et al. (1999) Evidence suggesting that a chronic disease self-management program can improve health status while reducing hospitalization: a randomized trial. Med Care 37: 5-14. Link: https://bit.ly/3kwSJXN
Ory MG, Smith ML, Ahn S, Jiang L, Lorig K, et al. (2014) National study of chronic disease self-management: age comparison of outcome findings. Health Educ Behav 41: 34S-42S. Link: https://bit.ly/3DnFEZn
Tan SS, Pisano MM, Boone AL, Baker G, Pers YM, et al. (2019) Evaluation design of EFFICHRONIC: the chronic disease self-management programme (CDSMP) intervention for citizens with a low socioeconomic position. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 16: 1883. Link: https://bit.ly/3jnh82E
Richardson G, Kennedy A, Reeves D, Bower P, Lee V, et al. (2008) Cost effectiveness of the Expert Patients Programme (EPP) for patients with chronic conditions. J Epidemiol Community Healt 62: 361-367. Link: https://bit.ly/3Bilka3
Esnaola S, Montoya I, Calvo M, Ibáñez B, Audicana C, et al. (2009) Desigualdades socioeconómicas en la mortalidad en el País Vasco y sus capitales: un análisis de áreas geográficas pequeñas (Proyecto MEDEA). Estudios Geográficos 70: 443-462. Link: https://bit.ly/2WBuLT8
Challier B, Viel JF (2001) Pertinence et validité d'un nouvel indice composite français mesurant la pauvreté au niveau géographique. Revue d'épidémiologie et de santé publique 49: 41-50. Link: https://bit.ly/3gYBFZZ
Communities OD (2015) Indices of Deprivation 2015 explorer. Available at Web site http://dclgapps. communities. gov. uk/imd/idmap. Link: https://bit.ly/3gEzavz
Timmins N, Ham C (2013) The quest for integrated health and social care: a case study in Canterbury, New Zealand. London: Kings Fund. Link: https://bit.ly/3mF9WAV
Beyond Silos Project. European project (2014) The EC Information and Communication Technologies Policy Support Programme. Available at Web Site.
Arroyo-Cobo JM (2011) Estrategias asistenciales de los problemas de salud mental en el medio penitenciario, el caso español en el contexto europeo. Revista española de sanidad penitenciaria 13: 100-111. Link: https://bit.ly/3jnWD67
Hoke S (2015) Mental illness and prisoners: Concerns for communities and healthcare providers. Online J Issues Nurs 20: 3. Link: https://bit.ly/2UTcAaO
García VC, Ros EO, Toledo LB, Girona NB, Royo AM, et al. (2000) Cómo son y de qué padecen los gitanos. Atención Primaria 26: 21-25. Link: https://bit.ly/3ktHJdL
Ministerio de Sanidad, Servicios Sociales e Igualdad (2014) Segunda Encuesta Nacional de Salud a Población Gitana.
Segunda Encuesta Nacional de Salud a Población Gitana 2014. Link: https://bit.ly/3DnFBg9
Davies K, Collerton JC, Jagger C, Bond J, Barker SA, et al. (2010) Engaging the oldest old in research: lessons from the Newcastle 85+ study. BMC Geriatr 10: 1-9. Link: https://bit.ly/3DpVHpG
Brackertz N (2007) Who is hard to reach and why?. Link: https://bit.ly/3DpxVdf
Davis I (2013) Progress in analysis of social vulnerability and capacity. In Mapping vulnerability. Routledge 147-163.
González MMP (2018) EFFICHRONIC: un primer paso hacia las personas con mayor vulnerabilidad. RqR Enfermería Comunitaria 6: 4-7. Link: https://bit.ly/2XUXPFy
González MP, Boone A, Alvarez-rosete A (2019) Health and Social Care systems reaching out to vulnerable populations with chronic conditions: the EU-project EFFICHRONIC. International Journal of Integrated Care (IJIC) 19.
Self-Management Resource Centre. Administrative/Implementation manual (2016) Link: https://bit.ly/3DzjO5x