My Child Doesn’t Need to be Vaccinated Because we Lead a Healthy Lifestyle: Compensatory Health Beliefs Predicting Intentions and Reported Child Vaccination

Main Article Content

Efrat Neter*
Bat-El Levi
Sharon Miller

Abstract

Background: In the past two decades negative attitudes towards vaccination has surfaced among parents. These concerns are related to safety, adverse effects, lifestyle and religious issues. The present study focuses on compensatory health beliefs (CHB), the beliefs that the adverse consequences of one health behavior are compensated by another health behavior, and examines whether CHB predicts behavior and mediates the association between the intention to vaccinate one’s children and vaccination behavior.
Methods: Parents (n=90) to children up to 6 years old filled an online questionnaire taping intentions and behaviors to vaccinate, self-efficacy to vaccinate, compensatory health beliefs related to vaccination and lifestyle.
Results: A significant negative association was found between CHB and intention to vaccinate and vaccination behavior (r=-0.69, p<.01), and a non-significant positive association was found between CHB and lifestyle. CHB partially mediated the association between intention and vaccination behavior (ZSobel=2.97, p<.01).
Conclusions: Future campaigns to increase vaccination should address CHB directly.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Neter, E., Levi, B.-E., & Miller, S. (2015). My Child Doesn’t Need to be Vaccinated Because we Lead a Healthy Lifestyle: Compensatory Health Beliefs Predicting Intentions and Reported Child Vaccination. Archives of Community Medicine and Public Health, 1(1), 022–025. https://doi.org/10.17352/2455-5479.000005
Research Articles

Copyright (c) 2015 Neter et al.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Licensing and protecting the author rights is the central aim and core of the publishing business. Peertechz dedicates itself in making it easier for people to share and build upon the work of others while maintaining consistency with the rules of copyright. Peertechz licensing terms are formulated to facilitate reuse of the manuscripts published in journals to take maximum advantage of Open Access publication and for the purpose of disseminating knowledge.

We support 'libre' open access, which defines Open Access in true terms as free of charge online access along with usage rights. The usage rights are granted through the use of specific Creative Commons license.

Peertechz accomplice with- [CC BY 4.0]

Explanation

'CC' stands for Creative Commons license. 'BY' symbolizes that users have provided attribution to the creator that the published manuscripts can be used or shared. This license allows for redistribution, commercial and non-commercial, as long as it is passed along unchanged and in whole, with credit to the author.

Please take in notification that Creative Commons user licenses are non-revocable. We recommend authors to check if their funding body requires a specific license.

With this license, the authors are allowed that after publishing with Peertechz, they can share their research by posting a free draft copy of their article to any repository or website.
'CC BY' license observance:

License Name

Permission to read and download

Permission to display in a repository

Permission to translate

Commercial uses of manuscript

CC BY 4.0

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

The authors please note that Creative Commons license is focused on making creative works available for discovery and reuse. Creative Commons licenses provide an alternative to standard copyrights, allowing authors to specify ways that their works can be used without having to grant permission for each individual request. Others who want to reserve all of their rights under copyright law should not use CC licenses.

Bloom DE, Canning D, Weston M (2005) The value of vaccination. World Economics 6: 15-39.

Velan B (2011) Acceptance on the move: public reaction to shifting vaccination realities. Hum Vaccin 7: 1261-1270.

World Health Organization (2014) [Internet]. Immunization surveillance, assessment and monitoring: vaccine preventable diseases.

Betsch C, Brewer NT, Brocard P, Davies P, Gaissmaier W, et al. (2012) Opportunities and challenges of Web 2.0 for vaccination decisions. Vaccine 30: 3727-3733.

Covolo L, Mascaretti S, Caruana A, Orizio G, Caimi L, et al. (2013) How has the flu virus infected the Web? 2010 influenza and vaccine information available on the Internet. BMC Public Health 13: 83.

Kata A (2010) A postmodern Pandora’s box: anti-vaccination misinformation on the Internet. Vaccine 28: 1709-1716.

Kata A (2012) Anti-vaccine activists, Web 2.0, and the postmodern paradigm–An overview of tactics and tropes used online by the anti-vaccination movement. Vaccine 30: 3778-3789.

McRee AL, Reiter PL, Brewer NT (2012). Parents’ Internet use for information about HPV vaccine. Vaccine 30: 3757-3762.

Witteman HO, Zikmund-Fisher BJ (2012) The defining characteristics of Web 2.0 and their potential influence in the online vaccination debate. Vaccine 30: 3734-3740.

Rainey JJ, Watkins M, Ryman TK, Sandhu P, Bo A, et al. (2011) Reasons related to non-vaccination and under-vaccination of children in low and middle income countries: findings from a systematic review of the published literature, 1999–2009. Vaccine 29: 8215-8221.

Wallace C, Leask J, Trevena LJ (2006) Effects of a web based decision aid on parental attitudes to MMR vaccination: a before and after study. BMJ 332:146-149.

Nyhan B, Reifler J, Richey S, Freed GL (2014) Effective messages in vaccine promotion: a randomized trial. Pediatrics 133: e835-e842.

Velan B, Kaplan G, Ziv A, Boyko V, Lerner-Geva L (2011) Major motives in non-acceptance of A/H1N1 flu vaccination: the weight of rational assessment. Vaccine 29: 1173-1179.

Reyna VF (2012) Risk perception and communication in vaccination decisions: a fuzzy-trace theory approach. Vaccine 30: 3790-3797.

Ernsting A, Schwarzer R, Lippke S, Schneider M (2012) “I Don’t Need a Flu Shot Because I Lead a Healthy Lifestyle”: Compensatory Health Beliefs Make Vaccination Less Likely. J Health Psychol 18: 825–836.

Knäuper B, Rabiau M, Cohen O, Patriciu N (2004) Compensatory health beliefs: Scale development and psychometric properties. Psychology & Health 19: 607-624.

Kim MJ, Lee CK, Gon Kim W, Kim JM (2013) Relationships between lifestyle of health and sustainability and healthy food choices for seniors. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management 25: 558-576.

Tickner S, Leman PJ, Woodcock A (2010) The Immunisation Beliefs and Intentions Measure (IBIM): predicting parents’ intentions to immunise preschool children. Vaccine 28: 3350-3362.

Kennedy A, Basket M, Sheedy K (2011) Vaccine attitudes, concerns, and information sources reported by parents of young children: results from the 2009 Health Styles survey. Pediatrics 127: S92-S99.

Lakerveld J1, Bot SD, Chinapaw MJ, Knol DL, de Vet HC, et al. (2011) Measuring pathways towards a healthier lifestyle in the Hoorn Prevention Study: the Determinants of Lifestyle Behavior Questionnaire (DLBQ). Patient Education and Counseling 85: e53-e58.‏

Toner K, Gan M, Leary MR (2014) The impact of individual and group feedback on environmental intentions and self-beliefs. Environment and Behavior 46: 24-45.

Radtke T, Scholz U, Keller R, Hornung R (2012) Smoking is ok as long as I eat healthily: Compensatory Health Beliefs and their role for intentions and smoking within the Health Action Process Approach. Psychology & Health 27: 91-107.

Fleig L, Ngo J, Roman B, Ntzani E, Satta P, et al. (2015) Beyond single behaviour theory: Adding cross‐behaviour cognitions to the health action process approach. Br J Health Psychol 20: 824-841.

Schwarzer R (2008) Modeling health behavior change: How to predict and modify the adoption and maintenance of health behaviors. Applied Psychology 57: 1-29.